Adaptive Behavior

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nolfi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Elman, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Adaptive Behavior, Vol. 3, No. 1, 5-28 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/105971239400300102

Learning and Evolution in Neural Networks

Stefano Nolfi

Institute of Psychology

Domenico Parisi

Institute of Psychology

Jeffrey L. Elman

University of California at San Diego

This article describes simulations on populations of neural networks that both evolve at the population level and learn at the individual level. Unlike other simulations, the evolutionary task (finding food in the environment) and the learning task (predicting the next position of food on the basis of present position and planned network's movement) are different tasks. In these conditions, learning influences evolution (without Lamarckian inheritance of learned weight changes) and evolution influences learning. Average but not peak fitness has a better evolutionary growth with learning than without learning. After the initial generations, individuals that learn to predict during life also improve their food-finding ability during life. Furthermore, individuals that inherit an innate capacity to find food also inherit an innate predisposition to learn to predict the sensory consequences of their movements. They do not predict better at birth, but they do learn to predict better than individuals of the initial generation given the same learning experience. The results are interpreted in terms of a notion of dynamic correlation between the fitness surface and the learning surface. Evolution succeeds in finding both individuals that have high fitness and individuals that, although they do not have high fitness at birth, end up with high fitness because they learn to predict.

Key Words: learning • evolution • neural networks • artificial life


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
D. Curran and C. O'Riordan
Increasing Population Diversity Through Cultural Learning
Adaptive Behavior, December 1, 2006; 14(4): 315 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
T. Jung, P. Dauscher, and T. Uthmann
Evolution and Learning: Evolving Sensors in a Simple MDP Environment
Adaptive Behavior, September 1, 2003; 11(3): 159 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
R. Aharonov-Barki, T. Beker, and E. Ruppin
Emergence of Memory-Driven Command Neurons in Evolved Artificial Agents
Neural Comput., March 1, 2001; 13(3): 691 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
B. Carse and J. Oreland
Evolution and Learning in Neural Networks: Dynamic Correlation, Relearning and Thresholding
Adaptive Behavior, June 1, 2000; 8(3-4): 297 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]