Adaptive Behavior

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register and gain free access

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cliff, D.
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Adaptive Behavior, Vol. 2, No. 1, 73-110 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/105971239300200104
© 1993 International Society of Adaptive Behavior

Explorations in Evolutionary Robotics

Dave Cliff

University of Sussex

Phil Husbands

University of Sussex

Inman Harvey

University of Sussex

We discuss the methodological foundations for our work on the development of cognitive architectures, or control systems, for situated autonomous agents. Our focus is the problems of developing sensorimotor control systems for mobile robots, but we also discuss the applicability of our approach to the study of biological systems. We argue that, for agents required to exhibit sophisticated interactions with their environments, complex sensorimotor processing is necessary, and the design, by hand, of control systems capable of such processing is likely to become prohibitively difficult as complexity increases. We propose an automatic design process involving artificial evolution, wherein the basic building blocks used for evolving cognitive architectures are noise-tolerant dynamical neural networks. These networks may be recurrent and should operate in real time. The evolution should be incremental, using an extended and modified version of a genetic algorithm.

Practical constraints suggest that initial architecture evaluations should be done largely in simulation. To support our claims and proposals, we summarize results from some preliminary simulation experiments in which visually guided robots are evolved to operate in simple environments. Significantly, our results demonstrate that robust visually guided control systems evolve from evaluation functions that do not explicitly require monitoring visual input. We outline the difficulties involved in continuing with simulations and conclude by describing specialized visuorobotic equipment, designed to eliminate the need for simulated sensors and actuators.

Key Words: evolutionary robotics • autonomous agents • genetic algorithms; SAGA • sensorimotor coordination • neural networks


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
I. Macinnes and E. Di Paolo
The Advantages of Evolving Perceptual Cues
Adaptive Behavior, June 1, 2006; 14(2): 147 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
R. Bianco and S. Nolfi
Evolving the Neural Controller for a Robotic Arm Able to Grasp Objects on the Basis of Tactile Sensors
Adaptive Behavior, March 1, 2004; 12(1): 37 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
R. D. Beer
The Dynamics of Active Categorical Perception in an Evolved Model Agent
Adaptive Behavior, December 1, 2003; 11(4): 209 - 243.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
B. Mathayomchan and R. D. Beer
Center-Crossing Recurrent Neural Networks for the Evolution of Rhythmic Behavior
Neural Comput., September 1, 2002; 14(9): 2043 - 2051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
P. Nordin and W. Banzhaf
An On-Line Method to Evolve Behavior and to Control a Miniature Robot in Real Time with Genetic Programming
Adaptive Behavior, January 1, 1997; 5(2): 107 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
R. J. V Bertin and W. A. van de Grind
The Influence of Light-Dark Adaptation and Lateral Inhibition on Phototaxic Foraging: A Hypothetical Animal Study
Adaptive Behavior, January 1, 1997; 5(2): 141 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
S. Nolfi
Using Emergent Modularity to Develop Control Systems for Mobile Robots
Adaptive Behavior, January 1, 1997; 5(3-4): 343 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
M. Dorigo and M. Colombetti
Precis of Robot Shaping: An Experiment in Behavior Engineering
Adaptive Behavior, January 1, 1997; 5(3-4): 391 - 405.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
P. M. Todd and H. A. Yanco
Environmental Effects on Minimal Behaviors in the Minimat World
Adaptive Behavior, March 1, 1996; 4(3-4): 365 - 413.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
R. D. Beer
On the Dynamics of Small Continuous-Time Recurrent Neural Networks
Adaptive Behavior, March 1, 1995; 3(4): 469 - 509.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
F. Gruau
Automatic Definition of Modular Neural Networks
Adaptive Behavior, September 1, 1994; 3(2): 151 - 183.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
B. M. Yamauchi and R. D. Beer
Sequential Behavior and Learning in Evolved Dynamical Neural Networks
Adaptive Behavior, January 1, 1994; 2(3): 219 - 246.
[Abstract] [PDF]