Adaptive Behavior

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register and gain free access

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guazzelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Arbib, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Adaptive Behavior, Vol. 6, No. 3-4, 435-471 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/105971239800600305

Affordances. Motivations, and the World Graph Theory

Alex Guazzelli

University of Southern California

Mihail Bota

University of Southern California

Fernando J. Corbacho

University of Southern California

Michael A. Arbib

University of Southern California

O'Keefe and Nadel (1978) distinguish two paradigms for navigation, the "locale system" for map-based navigation and the "taxon (behavioral orientation) system" for route navigation. This article models the taxon system, the map-based system, and their interaction, and argues that the map-based system involves the interaction of hippocampus and other systems.

We relate taxes to the notion of an affordance. Just as a rat may have basic taxes for approaching food or avoiding a bright light, so does it have a wider repertoire of affordances for possible actions associated with immediate sensing of its environment. We propose that affordances are extracted by the rat posterior parietal cortex, which guides action selection by the premotor cortex and is influenced also by hypothalamic drive information.

The taxon-affordances model (TAM) for taxon-based determination of movement direction is based on models of frog detour behavior, with expectations of future reward implemented using reinforcement learning. The specification of the direction of movement is refined by current affordances and motivational information to yield an appropriate course of action.

The world graph (WG) theory expands the idea of a map by developing the hypothesis that cognitive and motivational states interact. This article describes an implementation of this theory, the WG model. The integrated TAM-WG model then allows us to explain data on the behavior of rats with and without fornix lesions, which disconnect the hippocampus from other neural systems.

Key Words: affordance • navigation • motivation • hippocampus • parietal cortex; reinforcement learning


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
B. Girard, D. Filliat, J.-A. Meyer, A. Berthoz, and A. Guillot
Integration of Navigation and Action Selection Functionalities in a Computational Model of Cortico-Basal-Ganglia-Thalamo-Cortical Loops
Adaptive Behavior, June 1, 2005; 13(2): 115 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]