Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Adaptive Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hiraki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

From Egocentric to Allocentric Spatial Behavior: A Computational Model of Spatial Development

Kazuo Hiraki

T Electrotechnical Laboratory, Japan

Akio Sashima

T Electrotechnical Laboratory, Japan

Steven Phillips

T Electrotechnical Laboratory, Japan

Psychological experiments on children's development of spatial knowledge suggest that experience at self-locomotion and visual tracking are important factors. Yet, the mechanism underlying development is unknown. We propose a robot that learns to track a target object mentally (i.e., maintaining a representation of an object's position when outside the field of view) as a model for spatial development. Mental tracking is considered as prediction of an object's position, given the previous environmental state and motor commands and the current environment state resulting from movement. Following Jordan and Rumelhart's (1992) forward modeling architecture, the system consists of two components: an inverse model of sensory input to desired motor commands and a forward model of motor commands to desired sensory input (goals). The robot was tested on the "three cups"paradigm (in which children are required, under various movement conditions, to select the cup containing the hidden object). Consistent with child development, in the absence of the capacity for self-locomotion, the robot makes errors that are self-center-based. When given the ability for self-locomotion, the robot responds allocentrically.

Key Words: cognitive development • robot learning • egocentric • allocentric

Adaptive Behavior, Vol. 6, No. 3-4, 371-391 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/105971239800600302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?