Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Adaptive Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wheeler, M.
Right arrow Articles by de Bourcier, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

How Not to Murder Your Neighbor: Using Synthetic Behavioral Ecology to Study Aggressive Signaling

Michael Wheeler

University of Sussex

Peter de Bourcier

University of Sussex

The scientific account of intraspecific aggressive signaling is incomplete. In part, this is because it is difficult to identify the consequences (for the nature of signaling systems) of the different ecological contexts in which signaling has developed. The goal of our investigation is to complement the ongoing work in the biological sciences on this issue. Using a theoretical framework that we call synthetic behavioral ecology, we perform a series of experiments involving populations of simulated animals (animats) that, in their simulated world, must compete for food. When animats pick up reliable information about the "strength" of other animats within sensory range, a coherent form of collective behavior develops, which we call minimal territoriality. We then introduce the signaling of aggressive intentions. Each individual has a bluffing strategy that is determined by a form of artificial evolution in which there is no explicit fitness function. By varying, in energy terms, the cost of producing aggressive signals, and by analyzing the population dynamics at different costs of signaling, we are able to provide evidence that the handicap principle (according to which higher costs enforce honesty) can apply in multiagent ecologies. We then suggest how variations in the cost of signaling affect the territorial behavior. The article ends with a discussion of the current model and identification of some directions for future research.

Key Words: aggression • animal signaling • behavioral ecology • communication; handicap principle • simulation of adaptive behavior • territoriality

Adaptive Behavior, Vol. 3, No. 3, 273-309 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/105971239500300302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
S. Bullock
Jumping to Bold Conclusions
Adaptive Behavior, January 1, 1999; 7(1): 129 - 134.
[PDF]


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
J. Noble
Cooperation, Conflict and the Evolution of Communication
Adaptive Behavior, January 1, 1999; 7(3-4): 349 - 369.
[Abstract] [PDF]