This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Egbert, M. D. Articles by Di Paolo, E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Integrating Autopoiesis and Behavior: An Exploration in Computational Chemo-ethology

CCNR, University of Sussex, Brighton, mde{at}matthewegbert.com

Ezequiel Di Paolo

CCNR, University of Sussex, Brighton

It has been argued that the difference between an autonomous entity and an agent is in the ability of the latter to perform behaviors supplemental to processes of self-maintenance (autopoiesis). Theories have been proposed concerning how such behaviors might relate to autopoiesis, but so far, computational models of autopoiesis have paid little attention to these relations. In this article we present a new model designed to explore the relationship between mechanisms of autopoiesis and behavior. We report on three clarifications of the theory provided by the model: (a) mechanisms of behavior can be related to mechanisms of autopoiesis while remaining operationally distinct, (b) the organization of an operationally closed system can change over time while remaining operationally closed, and (c) behavior modulation based upon autopoietic efficacy has limitations that can be avoided through the use of a partially decoupled behavioral system. Finally, we discuss questions that have surfaced during examination of the model.

Key Words: autopoiesis • agency • behavior • operational closure • chemo-ethology • artificial chemistry

Adaptive Behavior, Vol. 17, No. 5, 387-401 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1059712309343821


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?