Adaptive Behavior

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register and gain free access

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valluri, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Adaptive Behavior, Vol. 14, No. 3, 195-209 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/105971230601400304
© 2006 International Society of Adaptive Behavior

Learning and Cooperation in Sequential Games

Annapurna Valluri

Department of Operations and Information Management, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania

The predictions of classical game theory for one-shot and finitely repeated play of many 2x2 simulta neous games do not correspond to human behavior observed in laboratory experiments. The promis ing results of learning models in tracking human behavior coupled with the growing electronic market and the number of e-commerce applications has resulted in an increased interest in studying the behavior of adaptive artificial agents in different economic games. We model agents with a reinforce ment learning algorithm and analyze cooperative behavior in a sequential prisoner's dilemma game. Our results demonstrate the ability of artificial agents to learn cooperative behavior even in sequential games where defection is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. We attribute the reciprocal-like behavior to the structural flow of information, which reduces the risks of exploitation faced by the second-mover. Additionally, we analyze the impact of the second-mover's temptation payoff and pay off risks on the rate of cooperative behavior.

Key Words: reinforcement learning • prisoner's dilemma • sequential games


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?