Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Adaptive Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seth, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Edelman, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Environment and Behavior Influence the Complexity of Evolved Neural Networks

Anil K. Seth

Gerald M. Edelman

The Neurosciences Institute, San Diego

How does environmental structure influence the dynamics of adaptive behavior and its underlying mechanisms? By analyzing the neural controller of a simulated head/eye system, we show that a specific measure—"neural complexity"—can be selectively sensitive to neural dynamics underlying rich adaptive behavior. Evolutionary algorithms were used to generate neural network controllers able to support target fixation in environmental and phenotypic conditions of qualitatively different complexity. Networks that evolved in rich conditions showed higher behavioral flexibility and robustness, and higher neural complexity, than networks that evolved in simple conditions. The magnitude of neural complexity, which reflects a balance between dynamical integration and dynamical segregation, depended on properties of both the environment and the head/eye phenotype. These results show that neurally complex dynamics can accompany adaptive behavior in rich environmental and phenotypic conditions; they are consistent with the proposal that neural complexity may represent a common property of the functional organization of adaptive neural systems.

Key Words: environment • behavior • mechanism • neural complexity • information theory • graph theory

Adaptive Behavior, Vol. 12, No. 1, 5-20 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/105971230401200103
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Logic Jnl IGPLHome page
C. Gros and G. Kaczor
Semantic learning in autonomously active recurrent neural networks
Logic Jnl IGPL, September 14, 2009; (2009) jzp045v1.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
X. Barandiaran and A. Moreno
Adaptivity: From Metabolism to Behavior
Adaptive Behavior, October 1, 2008; 16(5): 325 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
X. Barandiaran and A. Moreno
On What Makes Certain Dynamical Systems Cognitive: A Minimally Cognitive Organization Program
Adaptive Behavior, June 1, 2006; 14(2): 171 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
K. Davids, C. Button, D. Araujo, I. Renshaw, and R. Hristovski
Movement Models from Sports Provide Representative Task Constraints for Studying Adaptive Behavior in Human Movement Systems
Adaptive Behavior, March 1, 2006; 14(1): 73 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]