This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (16) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Berthouze, L. Articles by Lungarella, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Motor Skill Acquisition Under Environmental Perturbations: On the Necessity of Alternate Freezing and Freeing of Degrees of Freedom

Max Lungarella

Neuroscience Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan

In a recent study on the pendulation of a small-sized humanoid robot (Lungarella & Berthouze, 2002a, b), we provided experimental evidence that starting with fewer degrees of freedom enables a more efficient exploration of the sensorimotor space during the acquisition of a task. The study came as support for the well-established framework of Bernstein (1967), namely that of an initial freezing of the distal degrees of freedom, followed by their progressive release and the exploitation of environmental and body dynamics. In this paper, we revisit our study by introducing a nonlinear coupling between environment and system. Under otherwise unchanged experimental conditions, we show that a single phase of freezing and subsequent freeing of degrees of freedom is not sufficient to achieve optimal performance, and instead, alternate freezing and freeing of degrees of freedom is required. The interest of this result is twofold: (1) it confirms the recent observation by Newell & Vaillancourt (2001) that Bernstein’s (1967) framework may be too narrow to account for real data; (2) it suggests that perturbations that push the system outside its postural stability or increase the task complexity may be the mechanism that triggers alternate freezing and freeing of degrees of freedom.

Key Words: developmental robotics • embodiment • neural oscillator • freezing and freeing of degrees of freedom • entrainment

Adaptive Behavior, Vol. 12, No. 1, 47-64 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/105971230401200104


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. H. Lee, Q. Meng, and F. Chao Staged Competence Learning in Developmental Robotics Adaptive Behavior, September 1, 2007; 15(3): 241 - 255. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Davids, C. Button, D. Araujo, I. Renshaw, and R. Hristovski Movement Models from Sports Provide Representative Task Constraints for Studying Adaptive Behavior in Human Movement Systems Adaptive Behavior, March 1, 2006; 14(1): 73 - 95. [Abstract] [PDF]